Extradition to Iran and Judicial Assessment of Retrial Assurances under Turkish Law

Share this case

Keywords / Topics

🇬🇧 Summary

The case concerned an extradition request submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran against T.R. for offences including fraud, forgery, abuse, and unlawful acquisition of property.The Denizli 5th Heavy Penal Court found the extradition request admissible under Law No. 6706 on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters.The requested person appealed, arguing inter alia that:- the extradition request was procedurally defective;- the dispute was essentially civil/legal in nature;- he had applied for retrial before Iranian judicial authorities;- he had lived peacefully in Türkiye during the relevant period.The Turkish Court of Cassation examined the request under:- Law No. 6706;- the 2010 Agreement on Legal and Criminal Judicial Cooperation between Türkiye and Iran.The Court found that:- the offences fell within extraditable offences under Article 10 of Law No. 6706;- none of the refusal grounds under Article 11 existed;- the extradition documents sufficiently established identity and offence details;- the requested person had not consented to simplified extradition.Particular importance was given to diplomatic/judicial assurances transmitted through the Turkish Ministry of Justice, according to which:- the requested person would be retried in Iran;- criminal responsibility would be limited to the offences specified in the extradition request;- the person would not be extradited onward to a third State.The Court held that these guarantees were sufficient and upheld the admissibility of extradition.

Cite this case

Need to reference this case in a brief, article or submission?

Legislation

- Law No. 6706 on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters (Article 10, Article 11, Article 17, Article 18)
- Turkish Criminal Procedure Code (CMK) Articles 260, 285, 291, 298
- Agreement between the Republic of Türkiye and the Islamic Republic of Iran on Legal and Criminal Judicial Cooperation (3 February 2010)

The Turkish Court of Cassation reviewed the admissibility of an extradition request submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran against T.R., an Iranian national sought for offences described as fraud, forgery, abuse, and unlawful acquisition of property.
The extradition proceedings were conducted under Law No. 6706 on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters and the Agreement on Legal and Criminal Judicial Cooperation concluded between Türkiye and Iran on 3 February 2010.
The Denizli 5th Heavy Penal Court had previously found the extradition request admissible.
On appeal, the requested person argued that:
– the extradition request was procedurally irregular;
– the dispute concerned a legal/civil disagreement rather than criminal conduct;
– retrial proceedings had already been initiated before Iranian judicial authorities;
– he had peacefully resided in Türkiye.
The Court of Cassation examined whether the offences satisfied the extraditability requirements under Article 10 of Law No. 6706 and whether any refusal grounds under Article 11 existed.
The Court determined that:
– the offences were extraditable;
– the extradition file contained sufficient identifying information and supporting documents;
– the requested person had not consented to voluntary extradition under Article 17.
The Court further emphasized the assurances communicated by Iranian judicial authorities through the Turkish Ministry of Justice, including guarantees that:
– the requested person would be retried;
– prosecution would remain limited to the offences specified in the request;
– the requested person would not be re-extradited to another State.
The Court concluded that no legal obstacle prevented extradition and upheld the admissibility decision rendered by the Denizli 5th Heavy Penal Court.