Germany Extradition Law — Case Law, Legal Framework and Procedure

Extradition cases involving Germany — Requested and Requesting State

🇩🇪

Germany

Germany Extradition Law & Case Law — 34 cases

Case Law
Territorial Jurisdiction and Family-Life Proportionality in Extradition Proceedings under Turkish Law
Summary
The case concerned an extradition request submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany against G.B.F.E., a German national sought for fraud offences allegedly committed in 2018. According to German authorities, the requested person participated in an organized fraud scheme targeting elderly victims in Germany through telephone calls allegedly made from Türkiye.The İzmir 12th Heavy Penal Court found the extradition request admissible under Law No. 6706.The defence appealed, arguing inter alia that:- the requested person did not consent to extradition;- he had long resided in Türkiye;- he was married to a Turkish citizen;- he had a young child living in Türkiye;- extradition would disproportionately interfere with family life;- and he intended to apply for Turkish citizenship.The Turkish Court of Cassation held that the lower court failed to sufficiently investigate whether the alleged offences should legally be regarded as committed in Türkiye under Article 8 of the Turkish Criminal Code.The Court emphasized that:- Turkish law applies where acts are partially committed in Türkiye or where results occur in Türkiye;- the extradition file suggested that the alleged fraudulent telephone calls may have originated from Türkiye;- additional documents and clarification should therefore have been obtained.The Court further stressed that:the requested person’s long-term residence;- family integration;- Turkish spouse;- child living in Türkiye;- required a proportionality assessment under Article 11(4) of Law No. 6706.- The Court also identified deficiencies concerning specialty-principle guarantees under:- Article 10(4) of Law No. 6706;- Article 14 of the European Convention on Extradition.The extradition admissibility judgment was therefore quashed.
09/10/2023 · Turkish Court of Cassation (Yargıtay), 11th Criminal Chamber · E. 2023/4828, K. 2023/6902
🇹🇷Turkey → 🇩🇪Germany
Rejected (procedural grounds)Extradition
Country Contributor
Sören Schomburg
Knauer Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten mbB
Partner at Knauer Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten mbB, Sören Schomburg advises national and international clients in the areas of commercial criminal law and tax criminal law, international criminal law, and extradition law. He has extensive experience in complex, frequently transnational internal investigations and with respect to search and seizure, especially raids involving data confiscation.
He defends clients throughout Germany, in Europe and before the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and against INTERPOL.
His longstanding experience and networking in these areas enable him to provide clearly targeted advice and defence strategies to clients. He represents national and international companies and their managers.
He has authored numerous specialist publications on commercial criminal law, on INTERPOL warrants, and on the European Arrest Warrant. In addition, he regularly holds lectures at legal conferences on topics related to international legal assistance in criminal matters and on INTERPOL.
After his studies at Humboldt-Universität in Berlin and King′s College in London, he completed his postgraduate legal clerkship at the German Federal Foreign Office and a law firm in Tokyo, among others, and worked at a leading law firm in the area of commercial criminal law. In 2011, he joined the law firm named Ufer Knauer at the time, where he was appointed partner in 2020.
In 2023, he joined forces with Prof. Christoph Knauer and Dr. Björn Boerger to found the law firm Knauer Partner.
Sören Schomburg advises clients in German, English, Danish, and French.
Need legal assistance?

Extradition proceedings involving Germany

Contact a specialist lawyer with proven experience in extradition cases.

Contact →