Russia Extradition Law — Case Law, Legal Framework and Procedure
Extradition cases involving Russia — Requested and Requesting State
Connected jurisdictions
Key Resources
Latest News
Amnesty: misuse of Interpol red notices to target dissidents a grave institutional failure
Read →Amnesty International · 26 Jan 2026
Russia withdraws from the Council of Europe’s Anti-Torture Convention
Read → Council of Europe anti-torture Committee (CPT) · 03 Nov 2025
Case Law
Double Criminality and Human-Rights Review in Extradition Proceedings under Turkish Law
✕
Summary
The case concerned an extradition request submitted by the Russian Federation against an Uzbek national sought for:- murder committed to conceal another offence;- armed robbery committed by multiple offenders.The requested person was internationally sought through an Interpol Red Notice issued by Russian authorities.The İstanbul 15th Heavy Penal Court found the extradition request admissible under Law No. 6706 and the bilateral treaty between Türkiye and the Russian Federation.The defence appealed, arguing inter alia that:- the extradition materials had not been sufficiently translated;- the offences were time-barred;- extradition would violate fair trial guarantees and legal certainty;- extradition conditions had not been satisfied.The Turkish Court of Cassation upheld the extradition admissibility decision.The Court emphasized that:- the requested person was not a Turkish citizen;- the offences constituted serious ordinary crimes under both Turkish and Russian law;- the offences were neither political nor military offences;- the alleged crimes were committed in Russia and therefore did not fall within Turkish territorial jurisdiction;- there was insufficient evidence that the requested person would face discriminatory prosecution, torture, or ill-treatment upon extradition.The Court therefore concluded that the extradition request satisfied the requirements of Law No. 6706 and applicable treaty obligations.
03/04/2024 · Turkish Court of Cassation (Yargıtay), 1st Criminal Chamber · E. 2024/2511, K. 2024/2306
🇹🇷Turkey → 🇷🇺Russia
GrantedExtraditionContinuity of Extradition Admissibility Following the Entry into Force of Law No. 6706
✕
Summary
The case concerned an extradition request submitted by the Russian Federation against a Georgian national sought for prosecution for intentional homicide. Russian judicial authorities had initiated homicide proceedings and issued an in absentia arrest warrant dated 15 December 2000. The requested person was internationally sought for extradition to Russia.He was apprehended in Türkiye on 23 May 2017 while attempting to leave the country. Following arrest, Turkish judicial authorities ordered detention pending extradition proceedings.Russian authorities transmitted an extradition request through the Turkish Ministry of Justice pursuant to the European Convention on Extradition.The Heavy Penal Court found the extradition request admissible.The defence appealed.The Turkish Court of Cassation held that:- despite repeal of former Article 18 TCK by Article 36 of Law No. 6706,- the new law did not alter the requested person’s legal position.The Court further held that:- intentional homicide constituted an offence under Turkish criminal law;- extradition conditions were satisfied under: Law No. 6706; Article 6 ECHR; the European Convention on Extradition.The extradition admissibility judgment was upheld.
18/12/2017 · Turkish Court of Cassation (Yargıtay), 1st Criminal Chamber · E. 2017/1722, K. 2017/5151
🇹🇷Turkey → 🇷🇺Russia
GrantedExtraditionCountry Contributor
Anton Pulyaev
Advolaw
Anton Pulyaev is a Russian criminal defence lawyer and Managing Partner of ADVOLAW.
He has been in legal practice since 2006.
His practice focuses on white-collar crime, international criminal matters, economic offences, and business risk protection.
He advises and represents individuals and companies in complex criminal, regulatory, and cross-border cases.
He has been in legal practice since 2006.
His practice focuses on white-collar crime, international criminal matters, economic offences, and business risk protection.
He advises and represents individuals and companies in complex criminal, regulatory, and cross-border cases.
Need legal assistance?
Extradition proceedings involving Russia
Contact a specialist lawyer with proven experience in extradition cases.
