Latvia Extradition Law — Case Law, Legal Framework and Procedure
Extradition cases involving Latvia — Requested and Requesting State
Connected jurisdictions
Key Resources
Latest News
The Council of Europe anti-torture Committee announces periodic visits to eight countries in 2027
Read →Council of Europe anti-torture Committee (CPT) · 14 Apr 2026
Case Law
EAW surrender postponed over individual risk of inhuman or degrading treatment in Latvian detention
✕
Summary
The Amsterdam District Court issued an interim decision in proceedings concerning a Latvian European Arrest Warrant for the enforcement of a sentence. Following an earlier interim ruling and additional information from the Latvian authorities, the Court accepted that the requested person would most likely be detained in Liepāja Prison but held that the information provided remained too general to establish how he would be concretely protected against violence and other degrading effects associated with the informal prison caste system. The Court therefore found that the previously identified general risk had not been removed in the requested person’s individual case and concluded that he faced a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment if surrendered to Latvia. It consequently postponed the decision on surrender under Article 11(2) OLW, reopened and suspended the proceedings, and allowed a reasonable period for further information or changed circumstances capable of removing that individual risk.
06/08/2026 · Amsterdam District Court · 13-105253-26; ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:7940
🇳🇱Netherlands → 🇱🇻Latvia
Procedural orderEAWFurther information required on protection from violence and the degrading effects of Latvia’s prison caste system
✕
Summary
Latvia sought the requested person’s surrender under an execution EAW to serve the remainder of an eleven-year custodial sentence. The District Court of Amsterdam reiterated that detainees in Latvia face a general real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment arising from the informal prison caste system, including inter-prisoner violence and the degrading treatment of prisoners belonging to the lowest caste. The information provided by the Latvian authorities did not establish with sufficient certainty where the requested person would ultimately be detained or identify the concrete individual measures that would protect him from violence and the other adverse effects of the caste system. The Court therefore reopened and suspended the proceedings and requested further information concerning the likely place of detention and the specific protective measures to be implemented.
17/06/2026 · District Court of Amsterdam, International Legal Assistance Chamber · Case No. 13-105253-26 ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2026:6675
🇳🇱Netherlands → 🇱🇻Latvia
PendingEAWCountry Contributor
Raivo Klotins
Klotins
Mg.iur. Raivo Klotins has over 15 years experience as a criminal defence attorney.
His practice areas include but not limited to white collar crimes and extradition cases.
He often travels abroad in order to gain new knowledge in criminal and criminal procedure law.
Before starting his practice as an attorney Raivo served at different diplomatic posts abroad.
His practice areas include but not limited to white collar crimes and extradition cases.
He often travels abroad in order to gain new knowledge in criminal and criminal procedure law.
Before starting his practice as an attorney Raivo served at different diplomatic posts abroad.
Country Contributor
Gabriela Šantare
COBALT Latvia
Gabriela Šantare is Head of the Administrative and Criminal Litigation Practice Group at COBALT Latvia.
She represents clients in complex administrative, criminal, and constitutional proceedings.
Her practice includes administrative litigation, including complex tax disputes, as well as economic crime matters involving sanctions compliance, customs enforcement, and asset confiscation.
She regularly represents clients before courts of all instances and the Supreme Court, and where necessary, advances constitutional review proceedings before the Constitutional Court.
She represents clients in complex administrative, criminal, and constitutional proceedings.
Her practice includes administrative litigation, including complex tax disputes, as well as economic crime matters involving sanctions compliance, customs enforcement, and asset confiscation.
She regularly represents clients before courts of all instances and the Supreme Court, and where necessary, advances constitutional review proceedings before the Constitutional Court.
Need legal assistance?
Extradition proceedings involving Latvia
Contact a specialist lawyer with proven experience in extradition cases.
